Episode 99 The Ideal Board Game Player Part 2
The Ideal Board Game Player Part 2
Hi and welcome to Experience Points by University XP. On Experience Points, we explore different ways we can learn from games. I’m your host Dave Eng from games-based learning by University XP. Find out more at www.universityxp.com
On today’s episode, we’ll answer the question “What makes the Ideal Board Game Player?”
What makes the “ideal” board games player? Some say that it takes someone who fully understands the rules. Others would say that it’s more about those who pay attention to the game rather than be subjected to distractions.
Some feel that it’s tactical play and strategic thinking that makes the ideal tabletop player.
There are many reasons why someone would want to play with - and against - the ideal player. This episode will go into depth into the characteristics, qualities, and attributes of what makes good board game players and how you can encourage compatible play styles and overall positive group interaction.
This topic has been broken up into two separate and distinct episodes. The last episode addressed and explored the different aspects of successful tabletop gameplay within groups.
This included specific areas such as teaching and game hosting as part of a collective process as well as formal game elements such as structure, rules, and feedback.
This episode will focus on a study that was constructed and offered to the greater tabletop and board gaming community to garner their responses to the question “Who is the ideal tabletop player?”
The study’s main question was offered as a news article on www.universityxp.com on December 9, 2022 asking the question: “What makes the IDEAL tabletop player?”
The formal statement “Be easy to play with and hard to play against” was offered as a succinct way to summarize and balance the needs of the group as well as individual players.
In addition, the news article included a link to a survey asking participants to help answer the question by providing responses to five questions indicated on the survey.
Those questions included: What is ONE thing that GOOD tabletop players DO? What is ONE thing that GOOD tabletop players AVOID DOING? What is ONE thing that BAD tabletop players DO? What is ONE thing that BAD tabletop players AVOID DOING? and Additional Comments.
The study was publicized to tabletop and board game communities soliciting responses. The communities asked included the following 31 groups.
On Facebook these groups included:
Board Game Design Lab Community
GAMEWORK: Academic game industry and production studies
Game-based Learning, Gamification, and Games in Education
IGDA Learning and Education Games
IGDA Learning, Education & Games
Game-based Teaching and Learning Group
Game-based Learning in Education
Games and Learning Early Career Network
Educational Games Group: Play, Language, Avatars, Narrative, and Technology
GAMIFICATION and the University XP Facebook Page
On LinkedIn these groups included:
The University XP LinkedInPage
Games for Learning & Organizational Development
Applied Games and Gamification
The study was also posted to the board games subreddit on Reddit. However the post was removed by moderators of the group stating that “This post is off-topic to boardgames and has been removed. The subject matter may not fit the subreddit, only tangentially related to board games, or there exists a much better subreddit for this topic.” Therefore, responses could not be ascertained from this community.
The survey opened and began collecting responses on Friday December 9, 2022 and closed on Tuesday December 20, 2022. During that time a total of 25 viable responses were received.
Those responses were reviewed, sorted, and categorized according to different themes of participants responses. Those major themes extracted from the data are reviewed in this episode.
Participants provided survey responses that addressed 10 separate and distinct themes. Those themes included sportsmanship; player and group expectations; formal rules; communication; attention; distraction; player agency; physical space; cooperative hosting; and player strategy.
Some of these themes represented similar conclusions indicated by the literature covered in the previous episode, while others diverged from it. The following sections include an in-depth analysis of these themes including actual survey responses.
The most popular theme indicated in the study was “sportsmanship” which was identified in 15 responses. Specifically, this theme was divided into 3 sub-themes which included: temperament; decisions; and “griefing.”
Study respondents indicated that good players don’t lose their temper when the game doesn’t go their way. Likewise bad players take things personally when they don’t succeed in the game.
An overall connection between personal feelings and game performance was indicated in the ability to display good sportsmanship in this response. Specifically, good tabletop players “respect the dignity of other players” as well as maintain a divide between what happens in the game and their personal interpretation of it.
Likewise, good players do not lament or otherwise criticize their own or other players decisions in the game. Thus, good players take responsibility of the errors from their actions and accept the outcomes of events that they have no control over - such as RNG through dice rolls or otherwise randomized events.
Finally, sportsmanship was indicated as a matter of maintaining the “magic circle” of the game as well as group norms and expectations through their play. This manifested itself through the avoidance of kingmaking activities to spite other players as well as to maintain investment in the game despite their individual performance.
The latter is of particular importance as investment into the game as an activity is important for both individual players as well as the entire experience of the game group. Therefore, underperforming, because of their personal performance, diminishes the overall play experience for others involved.
Expectations represented the second most identified theme in the survey study which was tagged in 14 responses and is divided into 3 sub-themes including: games-based investment; group-based investment; and group dynamics.
The ideas and themes of sportsmanship carry over to this thematic category as the games-based investment sub-theme indicated the connection and integrity of the social contract for the game as a necessary component for all players involved.
Paradoxically, this means looking out for other players by also looking out for oneself and playing to the best of your ability, even though the game may have progressed to a point where some are no longer able to adequately compete against others.
This influenced the group-based investment sub-theme as bad board game and tabletop players will attempt to subvert the intent of the game designer as well as the expectations of other players when playing the game.
This can manifest itself in different ways including making “random" or "wrong" moves "just because" – for instance: playing for the "evil" side during a social deduction game if they are actually "good" side.
Finally, group dynamics were identified as the final sub-theme of game and player expectations. Specifically, how those expectations can be malleable and changeable throughout the course of play. This includes giving players adequate time to make decisions and take turns in games.
Of course, the amount of “appropriate” time to give these players varies from group to group and from play session to play session. Likewise, group dynamics also addresses how inter-player relationships are mitigated when new players join the group for the first time and how they are welcomed and made to feel a part of a collaborative activity. One of the first of which is dedication towards following and understanding the rules of the game.
Rules represented the next most popular theme tagged in 11 of the responses and is subsequently divided into 3 sub-themes: listening, clarity, and consistency.
Respondents to the study indicated that listening to the rules were a critical part of being a good table top player. However, in addition to listening to the rules they also “…double check their assumptions about how to play before play starts.”
Furthermore, good players not only listen and interpret the rules; but also offer up further explanations to other players as questions come up during play.
This speaks to the sub-theme of clarity where good players clarify - as part of a collaborative group process - the “…legality of a questionable move with the group before proceeding.”
Good players further “play by the rules, especially edge cases.” These specific scenarios possess an integral bearing on the overall impact of the game as edge cases could reveal an unfair advantage during play.
Such is the case for the discovery and exploitation of a loophole during gameplay. Conversely, bad players argue for points in play that are not specifically covered in the rulebook, and often to their benefit and advantage.
Finally, consistency was the last of the sub-themes under rules. Specifically, when it addresses the application of game rules throughout game play and to all players equitably.
Good players will strive to ensure that game play serves the overall experience. Therefore, the rules are meant to structure and give procedure to play, but that the overall experience of the game is in the hands of the players and with each other.
Communication represented the next most popular theme tagged in 11 of the responses and is subsequently divided into 4 sub-themes: transparency, jargon, clarity, and focus.
Transparency was an important aspect to ensure that communication was completed within the group to its’ benefit. Specifically making sure that new players had all the same information as the experienced players when it addressed the game structure and rules.
This transparency was however double sided as it included being transparent with the rest of the group when the game requires it; but also opaque when the game required that players hide certain information from each other: such as with social deduction games.
Additionally avoiding “jargon” in game communication was considered critical. This meant using terms that all other players were familiar with and explaining new or misunderstood terms.
This was essential with experienced players playing with new players and using jargon to their advantage to confuse those new players. Doing so violated the common group agreements and the magic circle of the game.
This influenced “clarity” in communication as group members are clear with each other as well as a player who has a specific role – for example a dungeon master - who openly communicates with the rest of the group; their options; and the overall structure of the game.
This also meant avoiding talking over other players when communicating as well as asking good questions that are relevant to the experience at hand.
Finally, focus represented the last sub-theme of communication where game related conversation and non-game related conversation is balanced out in favor of a positive group experience.
This means that while not explicitly banned at the table, talk about the game and its flow was paramount over idle chit chat.
Attention represented the next most popular theme tagged in 10 of the responses and is subsequently divided into 2 sub-themes: focus and follow.
Focus required that players pay attention to the game, the game state, and most importantly when it was their turn in turn-based games. This meant that the game experience could flow and continue to progress to the group’s benefit.
Good tabletop and board game players were identified as those who knew it was their turn without having to be reminded.
In addition to this, following other players’ activities, turns, and actions was also important for good players to observe. Specifically, when it is related to changes in the game and game state that would inevitably affect their next turn’s actions.
Ignoring this could create a social faux pax that negatively affects the group’s dynamic by misplaying an action that has negative consequences. A misstep that could have been avoided by adequately following other players’ activities.
Distraction represented the next most popular theme tagged in 10 of the responses and is subsequently divided into 2 sub-themes: phones and other players.
Phones represented a point of contention for tabletop players. Specifically, when checking phones meant a distraction from the game host who is leading the rules teach of the game.
This doesn’t mean that players can’t check their phones; rather that they do so in a manner that doesn’t adversely affect the group, as well as their ability to adequately learn and play the game.
Lastly, other players represented a source of distraction from game play. Specifically, when behavior undertaken by individual players slowed down or negatively affected the actions of others.
This manifested itself when good players let other players take their turns uninterrupted during play with “Good players avoid distracting other players when it’s their turn to keep the game rolling.” And “Good players avoid side conversations and other distractions / distracting actions.”
This also addressed the rules teach as good players avoided interrupting the host as they were teaching the rules of the game to the rest of the group.
Agency represented the next most popular theme tagged in 9 of the responses and is subsequently divided into 2 sub-themes: others’ autonomy and singular autonomy.
Autonomy is important for gameplay – particularly when it relates to player agency and how players take actions and make decisions in games. Therefore, good tabletop and board game players respect other player’s autonomy by avoiding “forcing their choices on other players.”
While it may depend on the specific group and the players around the table, this could also include respecting their desire to not take advantage of tactical and strategic insight. For example, good tabletop players avoid “giving advice which not asked for” as well as “alpha gaming / discount(ing) fellow players’ choices.”
Conversely, this is also mirrored in respecting the singular authority of players. This is most frequently seen in cooperative games with open information in which one player can “take control” of the game through a phenomenon known as “alpha gaming.”
The Alpha Gamer in this scenario dominates the play experience and subsequently the actions and activities of all other players. Therefore, good tabletop players know how to avoid this.
Furthermore, good tabletop players know how to respect and action their own autonomy by making the pivot to switching their strategy and tactics when the game situation demands it.
Likewise, they also must respect and commit to their decisions - no matter what the outcome is - in service of the game, the play experience and the group as a whole.
Physical space represented the next most popular theme tagged in 7 of the responses and is subsequently divided into 2 sub-themes: eating & drinking and components.
The physical environment is a common element for tabletop gaming, board gaming, and any venue or modality where there are physical components that are used or shared during play. Therefore, eating and drinking at the table is a common consideration for these players.
Good players “show common decency for the shared physical space of the game.” Good tabletop players can respect the physical space while eating and drinking by either using a napkin during play or avoiding consuming food or beverages all together.
Furthermore, good tabletop players also assist and help the group at the beginning and or end of the play session by collecting and distributing components as part of the setup and takedown process.
Likewise, they also honor and take care of components by not bending cards; by treating fragile and small components carefully; and by respecting the property of other players.
Cooperative hosting represented the next most popular theme tagged in 7 of the responses and is subsequently divided into 2 sub-themes: collaborating with the host and working with other players.
Cooperative hosting consists of the hosting duties of the game as well as the norms, values, and needs of the group. Therefore, good players made sure that the host was recognized for their effort.
Likewise, less experienced players could be supported in the theme of “cooperative hosting” by making sure that more experienced players helped them throughout the teaching process as part of a group effort.
In addition, bad players didn’t consider the needs and feelings of other players when playing the game. This could be more important in scenarios where there are significant age differences between players along with the subsequent emotional maturity of all players.
This means that as part of cooperative hosting duties; good players ensure that all elements of the game play including deciding to play the game; setup; teaching; playing; scoring; and take-down is done in the service of the game group and the play experience, rather than making the experience solely for themselves.
Finally, strategy represented the last most popular theme tagged in 6 of the responses and was not divided into any sub-themes.
Study respondents here indicated that bad players attempt to subvert the cooperative hosting and teaching of tabletop games by explaining strategy during the rules explanation.
Likewise, bad players also didn’t watch, learn, and adapt from other players’ actions and respond accordingly. As such, they were more prone to the negative consequences of such plays.
Good players meanwhile focused and visualized other players’ possible actions and how they would respond in turn. Such was a dedication and examination of Yomi in play that helped them develop a strategy as the game progressed.
Lastly, bad players failed to see how different aspects of the game’s mechanics influenced and affected one another. This examination and understanding of these game dynamics helped influence and determine what strategy they would adapt within the game moving forward.
While learning how to be a good tabletop and board game player has obvious applications for casual gamers and players alike; there are still uses for this in the applied games and the games-based learning realms.
The first is that game play as an interactive and social activity requires the participation of others in the group and a dedication towards the overall players experience.
From a design standpoint, this also means that serious games and games created for learning must intrinsically tie together the game’s mechanics and learning activities to meet stated learning outcomes.
Additionally, examining the tabletop game group as a collective whole highlighted the importance of determine and distributing responsibility in a way that collectively helps the process.
This means that groups of players that can come to an agreement on what they want from the play experience and then working towards that experience are better for it. By extension, groups of learners can do the same for any type of collaborative project: games-based learning or group work included.
This doesn’t mean that all groups should require highly experienced individuals. Rather, players and learners from different backgrounds and experience levels can combine their knowledge to work with one another to practice and develop the skills surrounding collaborative planning, expectations, and leadership. Such an outcome can be attained through the tabletop game group or from other applications of games for learning.
Finally, cooperative group engagement for tabletop game play also manifests itself in positive game outcomes. Should those game outcomes be tied to learning outcomes then a collaborative result of content engagement and mastery emerges from successful group play.
This episode examined in depth what it takes to be the ideal tabletop and board game player. This question was examined from multiple perspectives and discussed sources on tabletop game play; game elements; and group dynamics.
Teaching and game hosting were covered in addition to how game structure, goals, and feedback all address and influence how good tabletop players examine a game and interact with one another.
The form in which players interact with the game was based on a thorough understanding and application of the rules and game elements.
All of this, however, hinged on supporting competing personal and group interests in game play. Personal and group outcomes must be balanced to have a successful game group as well as establish oneself as an ideal tabletop player.
These expectations were based on the establishment and adherence to the expectations of the magic circle and the game group as a cooperative social contact with one another.
This social contract extended to specific priorities in game play including accurate and transparent communication; the active management of player roles; and the mitigation of different players’ styles.
This episode also included the results, analysis, and interpretation of a survey study conducted within the tabletop and board game communities which addressed several major themes outlining the best aspects of ideal tabletop players.
Those included sportsmanship, expectation management, rules, communication, attention, distraction, agency, physical space, cooperative hosting and strategy.
Finally, this episode closed on the applications of the results of this study and their use for applied games, serious games, and games-based learning for teaching, training, learning, and education.
I hope you found this episode useful. If you’d like to learn more, then a great place to start is with my free course on gamification. You can sign up for it at www.universityxp.com/gamificationYou can also get a full transcript of this episode including links to references in the description or show notes. Thanks for joining me!
Again, I’m your host Dave Eng from games-based learning by University XP. On Experience Points we explore different ways we can learn from games. If you liked this episode please consider commenting, sharing, and subscribing.
Subscribing is absolutely free and ensures that you’ll get the next episode of Experience Points delivered directly to you. I’d also love it if you took some time to rate the show! I live to lift others with learning. So, if you found this episode useful, consider sharing it with someone who could benefit.
Also make sure to visit University XP online at www.universityxp.comUniversity XP is also on Twitter @University_XP and on Facebook and LinkedIn as University XP. Also, feel free to email me anytime. My email address is dave@universityxp.com Game on!
References
Achterbosch, L., Miller, C., &Vamplew, P. (2017). A taxonomy of griefer type by motivation in massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Behaviour& Information Technology, 36(8), 846-860. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1306109
AEU LEAD. (2022, May 11). 10 qualities of an excellent team player. Insights From AEU LEAD. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://lead.amequity.com/insights/episode/10-qualities-of-an-excellent-team-player
Ariella, S. (2022, July 6). 12 qualities of an effective team player (with examples). Zippia 12 Qualities Of An Effective Team Player With Examples Comments. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.zippia.com/advice/team-player/n
Bar, A., &Otterbring, T. (2021). The role of culture and personality traits in board game habits and attitudes: Cross-cultural comparison between Denmark, Germany, and USA. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102506. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/episode/pii/S0969698921000722
Board Game Halv. (2021, March 7). What is an engine-building board game? Board Game Halv. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.boardgamehalv.com/what-is-an-engine-building-board-game/
Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active learning in higher education, 12(1), 23-33. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/146978741038772
CMOE. (2022, November 8). The 7 characteristics of a good team player. CMOE. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://cmoe.com/blog/characteristics-great-team-player/
Craymond. (2017, February 15). The Golden Rule and the magic circle. Active Learning in Political Science ©. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://activelearningps.com/2017/02/15/the-golden-rule-and-the-magic-circle/
Eng, D. (2019, December 10). Decision Space. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2019/12/10/decision-space
Eng, D. (2019, July 31). Fun Factors. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2019/7/31/fun-factors
Eng, D. (2019, June 04). Formal Game Structures. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2019/6/04/formal-game-structures
Eng, D. (2019, June 18). Feedback Loops. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2019/6/18/feedback-loops-in-games-based-learning
Eng, D. (2019, October 08). Game Dynamics. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2019/10/8/game-dynamics
Eng, D. (2019, October 29). Gaming with Motivation. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2019/10/29/gaming-with-motivation
Eng, D. (2019, September 10). The Player Experience. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2019/9/10/the-player-experience
Eng, D. (2019, September 17). Player Interaction. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2019/9/17/player-interaction
Eng, D. (2020, August 20). What is Player Agency? Retrieved January 25, 2023, from http://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/8/20/what-is-player-agency
Eng, D. (2020, December 3). Game Mechanics for Learning. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from http://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/12/3/game-mechanics-for-learning
Eng, D. (2020, February 20). Game Components. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/2/20/game-components
Eng, D. (2020, January 09). Socializing Games. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/1/9/socializing-games
Eng, D. (2020, January 09). Socializing Games. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/1/9/socializing-games
Eng, D. (2020, January 16). How do I win? Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/1/16/how-do-i-win
Eng, D. (2020, July 9). What is the Magic Circle? Retrieved January 25, 2023, from http://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/7/9/what-is-the-magic-circle
Eng, D. (2020, March 26). What is Games-Based Learning? Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/3/26/what-is-games-based-learning
Eng, D. (2020, May 28). What are interactive experiences? Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/5/28/what-are-interactive-experiences
Eng, D. (2020, October 1). What makes a good rule book? Retrieved January 25, 2023https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/10/1/what-makes-a-good-rule-book
Eng, D. (2020, September 10). What is Intrinsic Motivation? Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2020/9/10/what-is-intrinsic-motivation
Eng, D. (2021, July 27). How to teach someone to play a game. Retrieved January 25, 2023https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2021/7/27/how-to-teach-someone-to-play-a-game
Eng, D. (2021, July 6). What is Kingmaking? Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2021/7/6/what-is-kingmaking
Eng, D. (2021, October 26). Applied Games-Based Learning. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2021/10/26/applied-games-based-learning
Eng, D. (2021, September 28). Playing serious games. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2021/9/28/playing-serious-games
Eng, D. (2022, August 30). What is Yomi?. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2022/8/30/what-is-yomi
Eng, D. (2022, December 6). What are Game Goals and Objectives?. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2022/12/6/what-are-game-goals-and-objectives
Eng, D. (2022, September 27). What is Strategy in Gameplay?. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.universityxp.com/blog/2022/9/27/what-is-strategy-in-gameplay
Fehr, E., &Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(4), 185-190. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/episode/pii/S1364661304000506
Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P., &Bulbulia, J. (2013). How do rituals affect cooperation? Human Nature, 24(2), 115–125. https://link.springer.com/episode/10.1007/s12110-013-9167-y
Goodwin, M. W. (1999). Cooperative learning and social skills: What skills to teach and how to teach them. Intervention in school and clinic, 35(1), 29-33. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/105345129903500105
Great Bridge Links. (2021, July 21). Guide to become a consistently good board game player. Great Bridge Links. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://greatbridgelinks.com/guide-to-become-a-consistently-good-board-game-player/
Gross, J., &Vostroknutov, A. (2022). Why do people follow social norms?. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 1-6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/episode/pii/S2352250X21001494
H, M. (2016, March 28). Question of the month: The "alpha" gamer • the league of nonsensical gamers. The League of Nonsensical Gamers. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from http://www.nonsensicalgamers.com/question-of-the-month-the-alpha-gamer/
H., B. (2019, March 26). Tabletop Tuesday – social contracts and table norms. Pop Culture Uncovered. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://popcultureuncovered.com/2019/03/26/tabletop-tuesday-social-contracts-and-table-norms/
Heinzman, A. (2019, November 7). What is RNG in video games, and why do people criticize it? How. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.howtogeek.com/446695/what-is-rng-in-video-games-and-why-do-people-criticize-it/
Herrity, J. (2019, October 17). 6 qualities that make a great team player | indeed.com. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/team-player-qualities
Hillary. (2021, September 2). How to get better at strategy games: Board gamer tips. Game Night Gods - Plan Your Next Game Night. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://gamenightgods.com/become-a-better-board-gamer/
Iradian, M. (2021, October 29). Tips for teaching new board games to friends and strangers –... Meeple Mountain. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.meeplemountain.com/episodes/tips-for-teaching-new-board-games-to-friends-and-strangers/
Kent State University . (2023). What is experiential learning and why is it important? Kent State University. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.kent.edu/community/what-experiential-learning-and-why-it-important
Little, J. (2005, February 8). Social Contract of Gaming? I think not!!Jay Little. BoardGameGeek. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/6336/social-contract-gaming-i-think-not
McMillan, D. (2021, April 30). Board game step ladder – asymmetric roles. Meeple Mountain. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.meeplemountain.com/episodes/board-game-step-ladder-asymmetric-roles/
Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.). Home. MindTools. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.mindtools.com/ackh7tt/how-to-be-a-great-team-player
Perry, E. (2022, May 29). How to be a good team player at work: 8 tips. How to Be a Good Team Player at Work: 8 Tips. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.betterup.com/blog/how-to-be-a-good-team-player
Pope, A. (2021, October 4). 15 qualities of a great team member. Time Doctor Blog. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://biz30.timedoctor.com/team-member-qualities/
Riechers, M. (2022, December 6). What board games teach players in the 'magic circle'. Wisconsin Public Radio. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.wpr.org/what-board-games-teach-players-magic-circle
RPG Museum . (n.d.). Social Contract. RPG Museum. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://rpgmuseum.fandom.com/wiki/Social_contract
Sargeantson, E. (2023, January 19). 39 ways to be better at board games and win! My Kind of Meeple. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://mykindofmeeple.com/better-at-tabletop-board-games-win/
Siciliano, J. I. (2001). How to incorporate cooperative learning principles in the classroom: It’s more than just putting students in teams. Journal of management education, 25(1), 8-20. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/105256290102500103
Silbert, D. (2023, January 25). 5 qualities of a great team player. The Predictive Index. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://www.predictiveindex.com/blog/team-player/
TalentBridge. (2022, November 3). 7 qualities of an effective team player. TalentBridge. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://talentbridge.com/blog/7-qualities-of-an-effective-team-player/
thegiantbrain. (2022, February 23). RPGs and the social contract - there will be games. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://therewillbe.games/87910/7460-rpgs-and-the-social-contract
Vasilij. (2023, January 10). Why am I so bad at board games? (5 reasons). Victory Conditions. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://victoryconditions.com/why-am-i-so-bad-at-board-games/
Internal Ref: UXP34IH1X949